After reading “Sissy” we are challenged with the idea of gender roles and the major separation of them. A boy, William, is nicknamed Sissy and completely broke the “rules” of what it is to be a little boy and girl. There are many comparisons and contrasts between this story and The Wide, Wide World.
Within The Wide, Wide World we are presented a perfect little girl named Ellen who meets all of the criteria imaginable. This story set out guidelines for how little girls should be raised and within “Sissy” we see a little boy with admirable characteristics just like Ellen’s. “How careful Ellen was about that toast! The bread must not be cut too thick, nor too thin; the fire must, if possible, burn clear and bright, and she herself held the bread on a fork, just at the right distance from the coals to get nicely browned without burning” (Warner 5). The diction used to describe how much Ellen loves to do little chores for her mother, whom she loves dearly, is incredibly similar to the joy the little boy Willie, or Sissy, receives from making his lover clothing. “Sissy went to work with a will, and soon was in the mysteries of flouncing, tucking, ruffling, &c. ‘Snip! Snip! Snip!’ went the cheerful scissors” (Kellogg 139). Both children take great joy, as children should during this time, in doing chores for their loved ones. The challenge here is that Sissy is a little boy and not a little girl yet he takes great enjoyment in his women’s domestic duties. “True he always sat cross-legged when sewing, and whistled around and around his knitting, and fisted his bread instead of kneading it with his palms” (Kellogg 113). The comparisons between the chores Ellen performs and Sissy are very similar and they both take such great joy in doing work for the ones they love.
Gender roles are something that we have seen throughout children’s literature and progressively the line between women’s work and men’s work has been crossed but in Sissy it is blown way out of the water. In both stories the authors are clearly showing the way to raise children because they turned out exactly the way any parent would want their child to. Even though Sissy partakes in tasks women do, which is part of the social commentary the author is challenging, the boys in school still respect and almost admire him. “And so the name Sissy, given to the boy in ill-nature and decision, came to be the lovingly pronounced. He seemed to have a wonderful nature in sympathy with both boys and girls” (Kellogg 114). This passage shows that Sissy is a blend of both genders. Both novels present the idea of the ideal child and how to raise them but Sissy complicates the general perspective thinking of the differences between male and female children and their duties in this new American society.

